IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge level of preeclampsia in pregnant women, province of Santo Domingo, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Sánchez Villalba Sánchez Villalba
  • Lisbeth Estefany Castillo Paguay
  • Miguel Ángel Enríquez Jácome
  • Jenrry Fredy Chávez Arizala

Abstract

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a health problem that is among the main causes of maternal death and prematurity. It has an unknown etiology and is multifactorial in nature. This research was conducted with the aim of identifying the level of knowledge about preeclampsia in pregnant women. Methods: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in 61 pregnant women treated in 2 health institutions in Santo Domingo, Ecuador, selected in a non-randomized manner. A survey was applied consisting of 26 dichotomous questions with yes or no answers, classified by definition (3 questions), signs and symptoms (7 questions), risk factors (9 questions) and prenatal care (7 questions). The level of knowledge was classified as high (greater than 20), medium (16 to 20) and low (less than 16 points). Results: 54,1 % had a high school education as their highest academic level, 37,7 % reported having had 2 pregnancies, 65,6 % had at least one abortion. Regarding the level of knowledge; 31,2 % obtained an average level in signs and symptoms of preeclampsia, 31,1 % presented a high level on risk factors for preeclampsia, 11,5 % of the patients belonging to the San Agusto Egas Health Center had a low level; 62,3 % obtained a high level and 37,7 % an average level on prenatal care. Conclusions: A medium level of knowledge about preeclampsia was found among the pregnant women surveyed, highlighting the area of prenatal care, where no participant was classified as having low knowledge.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a24
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025105
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.