IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of job satisfaction in nursing staff of the Dr. Gustavo Domínguez General Hospital, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Calderón Landívar
  • Joselin Mabel Tigse Yánez
  • Yoselin Gricelda Garzón
  • Jenrry Fredy Chávez Arizala

Abstract

Introduction: personal satisfaction is related to how people see their work, as well as their attitudes towards it. This entity depends on internal and external factors to the worker. Nursing staff, due to the characteristics of the profession, find themselves in many situations. sometimes subjected to situations that cause dissatisfaction with their work environment. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating job satisfaction in nursing workers. Methods: a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on 73 nurses from the Dr. Gustavo Dominguez Hospital, Ecuador. A survey was applied using a Google Forms form, consisting of 23 questions structured into the following factors: supervision exercised by their superiors; the physical work environment; material benefits; intrinsic to the work; remuneration, basic benefits, and interpersonal relationships. Results: males predominated (46.7%), 39.7% were “very dissatisfied” with personal relationships with supervisors, 42.5% were “quite dissatisfied with the physical environment”, only 4.1% were “very satisfied” with salary and career advancement opportunities, and 28.8% rated intrinsic job satisfaction as “quite dissatisfied”. Conclusions: The presence of job dissatisfaction was identified in more than half of the nursing staff surveyed, with a higher negative assessment of the physical environment and intrinsic satisfaction. The above findings could be interpreted as an indicator of poor functioning and management of services in the institution.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a23
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025104
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.