IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavior of the combined use of plasma and Heberprot-P in diabetic ulcers, Guantánamo

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Basilé Romero
  • Pablo Javier Alcolea
  • Susana Esther Vargas Garcell
  • Leonardo Antonio Salgado Delgado

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most common diseases. One of its most common complications is diabetic foot; this, in conjunction with other vascular alterations, can lead to amputation. The combined use of Heberprot-P and platelet-rich plasma provides another therapeutic alternative to facilitate healing. Objective: To determine the behavior of the combined use of platelet-rich plasma and Heberprot-P in diabetic ulcers in the Angiology Department of the "Dr. Agoustinho Neto" General Teaching Hospital, 2025. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, and longitudinal study was conducted. The sample consisted of (n = 50) patients discharged from the angiology department. Twenty-five patients with neuroinfectious diabetic foot and 25 with ischemic diabetic foot were randomly selected. The variables studied were: healing time, diabetic foot types, healing percentage, and Wagner grade. Results: 70% of patients achieved 75% ulcer healing, of which 42% were neuroinfectious diabetic foot ulcers. The most common Wagner grade was grade II, at 48%. Fifty-four percent of patients achieved maximum healing between days 8 and 14. No significant changes occurred during the first week after starting treatment. Conclusions: Neuroinfectious diabetic foot ulcers respond better to treatment with Heberprot P and Plasma. Wagner type II ulcers have a more satisfactory outcome than other ulcers. The use of these treatments reduces healing time by 2 weeks.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a21
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025266
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.