IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' satisfaction with the implementation of a deglutition assessment procedure: cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Filipe Teixeira
  • Adriana Sentieiro
  • Andreia Cunha
  • Edgar Pires
  • Miriam Silva
  • Cátia De Deus

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia affects around 40 million people in Europe and increases the risk of aspiration in stroke patients by 4.08 times, making it essential to assess patients' swallowing abilities. At the Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital of the Amadora-Sintra Local Health Unit, the Volume-Viscosity Clinical Exploration Method is used. In January 2024, the swallowing assessment procedure was published. This study aims to identify the degree of satisfaction of nurses from the Neurology Service and the Adult Emergency Service at HFF regarding the implementation of the swallowing assessment procedure. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. A specific questionnaire was developed. The Qualtrics online platform was used to collect the data between June 3 and July 3, 2024. Quantitative data analysis was conducted. Results/Discussion: 38,46% of nurses working in these services responded to the questionnaire. The average age of the participants was 31,86 years old, with the majority working in the Adult Emergency Service. Satisfaction with the implementation of the procedure was 76,36% while satisfaction with training was 81,25%. The reported benefits of implementing the procedure were: simplicity and easy application (75,51%), easy interpretation of the result (85,71%) and facilitating the provision of an adequate diet (89,8%). These findings are evident in other studies on this topic. Conclusions: Nurses expressed satisfaction with the implementation of the procedure, as it enhances the quality of nursing care and facilitates patients’ functional readaptation.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a17
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025220
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.