IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2024v2a15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of chromic catgut implantation in men with idiopathic infertility

Author

Listed:
  • Kenia Ramos Padilla

Abstract

Introduction: the treatment of idiopathic male infertility is empirical and controversial. Objective: to assess the effectiveness of chromic catgut implantation at selected acupuncture points according to traditional Chinese syndromic diagnosis in men with idiopathic infertility. Methods: quasi-experimental study with pre-test-post-test and control group, in 135 patients with idiopathic infertility divided into: study group (67 treated with catgut implantation) and control group (68 treated with medication). A traditional medical history was taken and descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Results: Mean age was similar in both groups (33.90 ± 6.28 years study group and 33.68 ± 5.6 years control group). Patients with Kidney yang vacuum predominated (55.2 % study group and 52.9 % control group). Both groups showed highly significant differences in sperm concentration, motility and morphology before and after treatments and between groups. Clinical improvement (64.2 % vs. 8.8 %), spermogram normalisation (53.7 % vs. 16.2 %) and pregnancy achievement (17.9 % vs. 4.4 %) were higher in patients treated with chromic catgut implantation compared to those using Clomiphene. Conclusions: chromic catgut implantation in selected acupuncture points according to traditional Chinese syndromic diagnosis in men with idiopathic infertility is effective because it improves sperm concentration, motility and morphology, normalises the spermogram and contributes to achieving pregnancies with increased fertility, to a greater extent than treatment with Clomiphene; together with the clinical improvement of the patients.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2024v2a15
DOI: 10.62486/sic202455
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2024v2a15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.