IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rlatia/v3y2025ip361id1062486latia2025361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical AI for Personalized Banking: Addressing Bias and Fairness Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Muthu Selvam

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into personalized banking has enhanced service delivery in areas such as loan processing, credit assessment, and fraud detection. Despite these advancements, ethical concerns, especially algorithmic bias and lack of fairness, pose significant challenges. This study addresses the need for equitable AI systems that promote transparency, fairness, and regulatory compliance in the banking sector. Objective: This study aims to develop and implement a comprehensive framework for integrating ethical principles into AI-driven banking systems, with a focus on mitigating algorithmic bias, enhancing fairness, and improving transparency in personalized banking services. Methods: A comprehensive methodology is proposed that integrates bias-aware data collection, fairness-constrained machine-learning models, and explainable AI (XAI) techniques. Tools such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAPs) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIMEs) are applied to interpret model outputs. Adversarial debiasing and fairness-aware learning algorithms were employed to identify and mitigate systemic biases in financial data. Alternative data sources, including utility and rental payment histories, were incorporated to enhance inclusivity. Results: The implementation of the proposed framework demonstrates improved fairness in decision-making without significantly compromising model accuracy. Bias metrics show measurable reductions in disparate impacts across the demographic groups. Explainability tools enhance transparency, enabling a more transparent communication of AI decisions to both users and regulators. Conclusions: Embedding ethical principles into AI-driven banking systems is critical to ensuring fairness, regulatory alignment, and public trust. The structured framework presented in this study supports the development of responsible AI systems to mitigate bias, enhance explainability, and foster financial inclusion. This approach serves as the foundation for building equitable and accountable AI applications in modern banking.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:3:y:2025:i::p:361:id:1062486latia2025361
DOI: 10.62486/latia2025361
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:3:y:2025:i::p:361:id:1062486latia2025361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://latia.ageditor.uy/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.