IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rlatia/v3y2025ip313id1062486latia2025313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitude, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Study among Future Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Rodel C. Serdenia
  • Alexandhrea Hiedie Dumagay
  • Keir A. Balasa
  • Elenieta A. Capacio
  • Lovelle Diocess S. Lauzon

Abstract

This study investigated the extent of prospective teachers’ acceptance, attitudes, and perceived effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. It also examined whether these perceptions varied according to gender and age group. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 392 teacher education students enrolled in a state-managed university in southwestern Mindanao. The results revealed that the respondents generally demonstrated moderate acceptance, favorable attitudes, and positive perceptions of AI effectiveness in the teaching and learning process. While no statistically significant differences were found between genders, moderate effect sizes suggested subtle variations worth further exploration. Significant differences were observed across age groups, with older individuals reporting higher levels of AI acceptance. Strong and significant correlations among acceptance, attitude, and perceived effectiveness affirmed the interconnected nature of belief, emotion, and evaluation in shaping readiness for AI integration. These findings support the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In light of these results, it is recommended that teacher education programs integrate AI literacy and practical training, with targeted support for younger students to enhance digital confidence and preparedness.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:3:y:2025:i::p:313:id:1062486latia2025313
DOI: 10.62486/latia2025313
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:3:y:2025:i::p:313:id:1062486latia2025313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://latia.ageditor.uy/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.