IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rlatia/v2y2024ip110id1062486latia2024110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential of artificial intelligence in textual cohesion, grammatical precision, and clarity in scientific writing

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Roman-Acosta

Abstract

Introduction: the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in writing has significantly increased in recent years, promising improvements in textual coherence, grammatical precision, and clarity of ideas. This study focused on evaluating the long-term impact of AI usage on these aspects of academic writing. Objective: Identify the long-term effects of AI on cohesion, grammatical precision, and clarity in academic writing, while also exploring its ethical implications. Methods: a qualitative systematic review was conducted using the SALSA method, analyzing recent studies that address the influence of AI on writing quality. The databases used included Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Latindex, with results restricted to publications since 2023. Results: the findings indicate that AI can enhance cohesion, precision, and clarity in texts, especially when used as a support tool. However, the effectiveness of these improvements depends on the context of use and the appropriate integration of human intervention. Conclusions: although AI offers clear benefits in improving academic writing, its use raises ethical and legal challenges that must be addressed. It is crucial to continue researching to optimize these tools and ensure responsible use in educational settings

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:2:y:2024:i::p:110:id:1062486latia2024110
DOI: 10.62486/latia2024110
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rlatia:v:2:y:2024:i::p:110:id:1062486latia2024110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://latia.ageditor.uy/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.