IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rehabi/v6y2026ip18id18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of thromboembolic risk and preventive strategies in major orthopaedic surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Florencia Agustina Rosignoli
  • Fernando Lipovestky

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTD), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), was one of the main causes of preventable mortality in hospitalized patients. Its incidence increased significantly in those who underwent hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty, which led to the development of effective prevention strategies. Development: Risk factors associated with both the patient and the surgical procedure were identified. The Caprini scale was used to stratify them, including in orthopedic patients. In terms of pharmacological prophylaxis, anticoagulants such as low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and aspirin (ASA) were compared. Different studies showed that ASA was similarly effective to LMWH in low-risk patients, with advantages such as lower cost and better tolerance. However, DOACs offered a slight superiority in efficacy, although with a higher risk of bleeding. Current recommendations favored a combination of pharmacological and mechanical measures such as early ambulation and the use of compression stockings. Conclusion: The prevention of VTE in major orthopedic surgery required an individualized and evidence-based approach. Aspirin emerged as a valid alternative in certain cases, without completely replacing other anticoagulants in high-risk patients. Further research was considered essential, especially in local contexts such as Argentina, to adapt strategies according to the needs of the health system.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:6:y:2026:i::p:18:id:18
DOI: 10.56294/ri202618
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:6:y:2026:i::p:18:id:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ri.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.