IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rehabi/v5y2025ip26id26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decompressive Craniectomy As A Treatment In Patients With Cranio-Brain Trauma At The Central Hospital Of Maracay

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Aguiar
  • Miguel Flores
  • Claudia León
  • German Pinto
  • Mildred Lupi

Abstract

The general objective: To evaluate decompressive craniectomy (DC) as a treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the Central Hospital of Maracay. January-July 2024. Materials and Methods: The study is descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional. Glasgow and Marshall coma scale, clinical characteristics and imaging findings were applied. Results: 15 patients aged 49±23.5 years, 93% male, were studied. The main cause of TBI was a motorcycle accident and another (53.3%). Before CD, 80% had moderate TBI, 66.66% had normal pupils, 46.67% entered II and 33,33% were placed in IV on the Marshall scale. Subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma predominated with 26.67% in each case. The midline deviation was 8.5±2.4 mm. The CD application time was 11±9.6 hours. After CD, 46.66% and 26.67% were classified as having moderate and mild TBI respectively. 40% had normal pupils, 20% died and 66.67% were not admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Although the results were favorable after CD, the differences did not show statistical significance (p≥0.05) so it is recommended to expand the sampling. Conclusion: The results suggest that decompressive craniectomy is recommended as a treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury, with satisfactory results in ages 20-40 years and moderate and mild TBI on the Glasgow scale. However, in patients over 60 years of age and a Glasgow scale score of less than 9 points, the results may be unfavorable.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:5:y:2025:i::p:26:id:26
DOI: 10.56294/ri202526
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:5:y:2025:i::p:26:id:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ri.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.