IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rehabi/v5y2025ip103id103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological method in the evaluation of rehabilitation procedures in Multiple Sclerosis with neurogenic bladder

Author

Listed:
  • Osvaldo Fraga Ramirez
  • Maikel Herrera Broche
  • Dianelys Hernández Chisholm
  • Elaine Teresa Gutiérrez Pérez
  • Tania Rosa González García
  • Ángel Luis Menéses Foyo

Abstract

Introduction: the technological method of health makes it possible to direct the technological process efficiently, to know the structure of the problems and their relationships for care from the physical-rehabilitative point of view. Therefore, the authors identify as an objective of the research: to argue the link between the technological method of health in the evaluation process of rehabilitative technological procedures in Multiple Sclerosis with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Method: a longitudinal descriptive study with a qualitative approach was carried out in the period from January to October 2024, in the Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation department of the Villa Clara Clinical-Surgical University Hospital "Arnaldo Milián Castro". For the theoretical inquiries, the following theoretical levels were used: analytical-synthetic, historical-logical, systematization and the statistical-mathematical level: descriptive statistics. Results: In rehabilitation, the technological method combined with clinical-epidemiological assessments allows decision-making from a health-based, humanistic and socially inclusive approach. In addition, it facilitates the structuring of the stages in which rehabilitation procedures will be carried out aimed at the recovery of people diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Conclusions: the evaluation of rehabilitation technological procedures associated with the technological method of health will allow more accurate treatment guidelines to be established and implemented.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:5:y:2025:i::p:103:id:103
DOI: 10.56294/ri2025103
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:5:y:2025:i::p:103:id:103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ri.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.