Author
Listed:
- Leonardo De Souza Ferreira Frasson
- Daniel Chiachiara
Abstract
Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) infections in post-surgical patients represent a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. The physicochemical analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a key diagnostic tool that allows for the evaluation of parameters such as glucose, proteins, and lactate to detect infections. With the development of molecular techniques, such as PCR, the accuracy in pathogen detection has improved. However, there are still questions regarding the reliability of traditional methods compared to these advanced techniques, especially in patients who have received prior antibiotic treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability of the physicochemical analysis of CSF as a diagnostic tool for CNS infections in post-surgical patients and to compare it with alternative methods such as PCR, bacterial cultures, and biological markers. The study aims to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each method to improve diagnostic accuracy in this clinical context. This study is a systematic literature review that includes studies evaluating the physicochemical analysis of CSF, PCR, and bacterial cultures in post-surgical patients with suspected CNS infection. Scientific databases were used, applying specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the relevance and quality of the selected studies. The results suggest that although the physicochemical analysis of CSF is useful as an initial tool, it has limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity in patients who have received antibiotic treatment, with sensitivity ranging between 60% and 70%. In contrast, multiplex PCR offers superior sensitivity and specificity, reaching 92% and 98%, respectively. The combination of methods, including the use of biomarkers such as procalcitonin, improves diagnostic accuracy by 30% compared to traditional physicochemical analysis. The physicochemical analysis of CSF remains useful as an initial test, but its effectiveness is limited in post-surgical patients who have received antibiotic treatment. Combining this analysis with molecular techniques and biomarkers significantly enhances the accuracy and speed of diagnosis, thereby supporting a comprehensive diagnostic approach that optimizes the clinical management of CNS infections in the post-surgical context.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025589:id:1056294piii2025589
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025589:id:1056294piii2025589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.