IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v3y2025ip1056294piii2025508id1056294piii2025508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Variables Associated with the Prevalence of Cesarean Sections: A Study at Evita Pueblo Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Mabel Escurra Giménez
  • José Vicente Postorivo Nauman

Abstract

Introduction: Caesarean sections are surgical procedures in obstetrics that can save the lives of mothers and newborns in medically indicated cases. However, they are very frequently performed without medical justification, putting the health of women and their babies at risk. The international community has established that the ideal rate of caesarean sections should be between 10% and 15% of the population. (1) The caesarean section rate in Argentina averaged 34.7% according to the Perinatal Information System in 2017, with an increase of 23% from 2010 to 2017. (2) A retrospective study was carried out based on a review of clinical cases of caesarean sections performed over a period of six months in the obstetrics and gynaecology department of the Evita Pueblo hospital. Data was collected from clinical records and comparative variables were analysed. Data analysis included descriptive and analytical statistical methods. During the study, a caesarean section rate of 43.5% was observed out of a total of 802 deliveries, with a higher prevalence in women aged 20 to 35 and in those in a stable relationship. The majority of newborns weighed between 2500 and 4000 grams, and 90% of the caesarean sections were performed on pregnancies of more than 37 weeks. The findings suggest a high caesarean section rate compared to international standards, highlighting the influence of demographic and obstetric factors in the choice of this type of delivery. Further research is needed on the subject, as there is little information in similar contexts, and institutional practices should be evaluated to optimize the use of this intervention.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025508:id:1056294piii2025508
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025508:id:1056294piii2025508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.