IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v3y2025ip1056294piii2025507id1056294piii2025507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative evaluation between conventional and laparoscopic hernioplasty, it’s indications and complications

Author

Listed:
  • Maicon Otávio Ramos Brandi
  • José Luis D’Addino
  • Ana Veira

Abstract

Hernia is one of the most prevalent wall pathologies, and its resolution can be achieved through conventional or laparoscopic methods. This study provides information on inguinal hernias and their various presentations according to etiology. Additionally, it addresses different causes related to age, comorbidities, and prior surgeries. The methods of resolution through open hernioplasty and laparoscopic techniques were analyzed, and the postoperative complications of the patients involved in the study were also considered. This systematic review utilized search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scielo to find clinical trials and randomized studies, identifying statistical analyses on the use of both surgical techniques. This study compared the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using laparoscopic and open techniques in 204 patients (96.6% male, 3.4% female), with an average age of 53.5 years. The duration of the procedure, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and recovery time were analyzed. Laparoscopic surgery had a longer operative time compared to the open technique, but showed benefits such as shorter recovery time (7 days versus 14.5 days, P

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025507:id:1056294piii2025507
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025507:id:1056294piii2025507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.