IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v3y2025ip1056294piii2025466id1056294piii2025466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distraction techniques and pain in venous puncture in children aged 2 to 12 years in a Pediatric Intermediate Hospitalization Ward in the months of November-December 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Obando
  • María Antonieta Pardal

Abstract

Procedural pain management is an underutilized practice in children, despite the availability of effective treatments. In recent years, there have been several investigations on how to minimize pain in children during invasive procedures. The aim of this study is to describe the relationship between the use of distraction techniques and pain during venous puncture in children from 2 to 12 years of age, in a Pediatric Intermediate Hospitalization Ward during the months of November-December 2020. A qualitative, non-experimental, in-depth descriptive and cross-sectional research was conducted on 11 nursing professionals. A 14-item self-administered questionnaire collected information on the sociodemographic characteristics of the nurses, the knowledge and experience in distraction techniques and the assessment of pain outcomes when applied. A theoretical approach based on non-pharmacological techniques in pain prevention was used. The nurses participating in the study comprised a group with a majority of technical degrees (82%) and 45% with more than 5 years of seniority as pediatric nurses. All the nurses said they were aware of the existence of distraction techniques. Nine nurses (81.81%) stated that the techniques are effective because the patient calms down before starting the technique (4 nurses) and because the distractor distracts them from what is happening (5 nurses). Two professionals perceive that the technique does not change the patient's pain or stress situation because distrust of the technique or of the health care team outweighs the distractors. Post-technique respiratory and heart rate indicators contradicted the nurses' perception of usefulness

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025466:id:1056294piii2025466
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025466:id:1056294piii2025466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.