IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v3y2025ip1056294piii2025367id1056294piii2025367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conscientious objection in nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Romina Fabiana Maldonado

Abstract

Introduction: Conscientious objection (CO) constitutes an ethical and legal challenge for health professionals, who face conflicts between their personal beliefs and obligations towards patients and current regulations. In the province of Santa Fe, this issue has gained relevance in the field of nursing, which is an essential part of interdisciplinary health teams. Although national legislation addresses some aspects of CO, there are still legal gaps that generate uncertainty for both professionals and institutions. The aim of this study was to analyze the problems of CO in nursing, providing historical background, legal advances and an approach to the rights and duties of these professionals in the current healthcare context. A documentary and descriptive analysis was carried out, based on a review of national regulations and reports on the application of CO in the healthcare setting. The study included consultations with health authorities in Santa Fe to identify the main demands and conflicts arising from this practice. The study revealed a use and abuse of CO by some professionals, which generated discontent among the population and affected the provision of services. Lack of knowledge of the meaning and scope of OC contributed to the problem. Health authorities intervened to address the situation, establishing guidelines that seek to balance individual rights and collective responsibilities. CO in nursing is a complex issue that requires clear regulation and adequate training. The need to implement educational and legislative policies to ensure ethical professional practice that respects both individual values and patients' needs was highlighted

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025367:id:1056294piii2025367
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025367:id:1056294piii2025367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.