IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v2y2024ip1056294piii2024207id1056294piii2024207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postpartum nursing care for premature rupture of membranes

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Aquino-Risco
  • María Teresa Cabanillas-Chavez
  • Wilter C. Morales-García

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean section is a surgical technique through an incision in the abdominal and uterine wall, before an unfeasible vaginal delivery or if there is maternal or fetal risk. The risk of bleeding in surgeries such as caesarean section does not allow early ambulation to begin, so it will be dependent on the care of the nurse. To recognize the role of nursing in the management of acute pain and uterine atony in a post-cesarean patient due to premature rupture of membranes in a National Hospital of Ayacucho, 2021. Methodology: Qualitative clinical case study, 29-year-old patient selected for convenience ; in which the Nursing Care Process (PAE) was applied as a methodology and the data collection instrument was the assessment sheet according to the eleven functional patterns of Marjory Gordon. Nine nursing diagnoses have been identified, of which, through the AREA model, acute pain related to injury by physical agent has been prioritized: operative wound. Nursing interventions were carried out according to the NOC and NIC taxonomy, obtaining favorable results for the patient. Regarding the risk of complication, uterine atony, it is not yet possible to specify the results since the risk will continue in the coming days. The identification of the clinical aspects of the post-cesarean patient due to premature rupture of membranes was carried out, the interventions achieved favorable results in the patient. However, care is still continued due to the risk of uterine atony and, consequently, postpartum hemorrhage.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:2:y:2024:i::p:1056294piii2024207:id:1056294piii2024207
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:2:y:2024:i::p:1056294piii2024207:id:1056294piii2024207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.