IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/perspe/vyip37id37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Superstition and judgments against the Indians in the bishopric of Michoacán

Author

Listed:
  • Quetzalcóatl Tonatiuh Uribe Sánchez

Abstract

Justice in New Spain was divided into ordinary and special. The former included the Supreme Council of the Indies, the Royal Courts and local authorities such as mayors and magistrates. The latter, of a religious nature, was in the hands of ecclesiastical judges, who dealt with crimes of faith and public morality. In 1573, Philip II established that ordinary justice should assist ecclesiastical justice in cases involving indigenous people. The royal government supervised the administration of justice to prevent abuses, although corruption remained a latent problem. The chief magistrates and senior mayors represented the Crown and ensured that conflicts were not resolved arbitrarily. The Church, for its part, regulated religious practices and prosecuted crimes of superstition such as idolatry and sorcery, which were considered offenses against both the faith and the social order. The judicial process in cases of superstition combined civil and ecclesiastical jurisdiction, under the principle of mixed jurisdiction. The indigenous people, due to their special legal status, were tried with less severe penalties, avoiding corporal punishment. In the autos de fe, the guilty received public penances. The New Spain justice system sought social control through the fusion of political and religious power, ensuring that the indigenous people were integrated into the colonial structure under the rule of the Crown and ecclesiastical tutelage.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:perspe:v::y::i::p:37:id:37
DOI: 10.56294/pa2024.37
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:perspe:v::y::i::p:37:id:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pa.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.