IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/perspe/vyip202430id202430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioethical assessment of embryo donation for research

Author

Listed:
  • Wênnia Suelem Fontinele Silva
  • Silvia J. Birnenbaum

Abstract

Introduction: the present study aims to assess, from the bioethical tool, the use of embryos for scientific research and its impact on society. The research question is posed: "what bioethical aspects are related to the donation of excess embryos from cryopreservation laboratories?". The secondary objectives include determining the level of knowledge of the population about assisted reproduction techniques, identifying knowledge about the possible destinations of cryopreserved embryos and evaluating the positioning capacity of the population regarding ethical and moral issues. Method: observational study of a statistical nature through a questionnaire with relevant questions on the subject of bioethics in the investigation of surplus embryos from cryopreservation. The study population was composed of people of different sex and age, who are interested in gynecology issues. Results: the survey reveals that 55,8 % knew about assisted fertilization techniques, 80,8 % knew what IVF was, 69,2 % were unaware of related laws, 84,6 % understood informed consent in cryopreservation , 46 % would not sign a long-term consent, 80,4 % knew about cryopreservation, 82,7 % support embryo freezing, 72,5 % support embryo research, and there are divided opinions about its status : 60,8 % cells, 51,9 % human beings. Conclusion: the survey reveals that the participants have a general knowledge about assisted fertilization techniques and support the cryopreservation of embryos for research. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the laws that govern these techniques. Opinions are also divided on the nature and status of the frozen embryos. These results are relevant for the ethical debate and the regulation of practices related to embryos

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:perspe:v::y::i::p:202430:id:202430
DOI: 10.56294/pa202430
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:perspe:v::y::i::p:202430:id:202430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pa.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.