Author
Listed:
- Jennifer Lizcano Ramírez
- Sebastián Isaac Peralta Hurtado
- Katherine Suley Zambrano Alvear
- Jenrry Fredy Chávez-Arizala
Abstract
Introduction: Nutrition in old age was recognized as a key determinant of well-being and autonomy. Deficiencies and excesses in nutrition coexisted in older adults, with effects on morbidity, functionality, and quality of life. From a systems perspective, Betty Neuman's model allowed for an understanding of the interaction between the individual and the environment, placing prevention and system stability as goals of care. Within this framework, the aim was to describe the quality of dietary practices and identify their main determinants. Development: The study addressed eating habits as a result of interrelated factors: psychological (emotional state, stress), socioeconomic (income, family support, advertising), environmental (accessibility, portion size, eating in company), and physiological (hunger/satiety, senses, age). The quality of the practice was defined as adherence to specific recommendations and needs, incorporating diversity, balance, safety, and affordability. Critical requirements for older adults were reviewed—high biological value proteins, vitamins B12 and B6, calcium, magnesium, fiber, and water—and malnutrition (undernutrition, overweight/obesity, sarcopenia) was characterized. The nutritional assessment included dietary history and anthropometric and functional indicators. Based on Neuman's model, behavior modification and nutrition education strategies were described, along with community actions to improve access and affordability, and the inclusion of adapted physical activity as an adjunct. Conclusions: It was concluded that intervening in the nutrition of older adults required an integrated, person-centered approach based on Neuman's Systems Model. Prioritizing systematic nutritional screening, protein-micronutrient prescription, continuing education with family support, and improvements in the food environment projected benefits on autonomy and quality of life. It was recommended that cost-effectiveness be evaluated and interventions be adapted to local heterogeneities.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:nursin:2024v3a26
DOI: 10.56294/nds2024141
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:nursin:2024v3a26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://nds.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.