IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/multid/v3y2025ip56id1062486agmu202556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientometrics in Argentina from an analysis of scientific production: Who does it?

Author

Listed:
  • William Castillo-González
  • Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo
  • Javier González-Argote

Abstract

Introduction: In Argentina, bibliometrics and scientometrics have become crucial for evaluating scientific research. These disciplines use indicators and statistical tools to measure scientific production, identify trends and collaborations, and guide academic management. Despite their value, limitations and biases are recognized, emphasizing the need for ethical use. Methods: This bibliometric study analyzes the scientific production of authors affiliated to Argentine institutions in the field of bibliometrics and scientometrics using the Scopus database, covering a period from 2013 to 2022. Results and discussion: We found 271 articles with 1175 authors, with an average of 4.33 authors per article and a total of 2995 citations. The most represented areas were social sciences (35.8%), medicine (17.3%), and computer science (15.9%). International collaboration was common, with a positive impact on the number of citations. The University of Buenos Aires led the production, and a decrease in citations per article was observed, possibly related to the defunding of science in the region. Conclusion: Despite the reduction in the number of citations per publication, the impact of citations weighted by field has increased in the field of scientometrics in Argentina, especially in public universities. Although a collaborative network has not been confirmed, it stands out that social sciences is the most represented discipline and the most productive researchers belong to this field, highlighting the need to foster collaboration to boost scientometrics research in the country

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:multid:v:3:y:2025:i::p:56:id:1062486agmu202556
DOI: 10.62486/agmu202556
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:multid:v:3:y:2025:i::p:56:id:1062486agmu202556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://multidisciplinar.ageditor.uy/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.