IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/multid/v2y2024ip119id1062486agmu2024119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likes are not votes: Critical analysis of the influence of electoral campaigns onTikTok in relation to the results of the presidential election, Mexico 2024

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Dalila Rodríguez Tienda
  • Alejandro Flores Maya

Abstract

Introduction: The study analyzed the influence of digital presence on TikTok on electoral results in Mexico. It was framed within the literature on digital democracy and the link between the media and electoral behavior. Given that TikTok has gained relevance as a political platform, the objective was to determine if popularity on this social network translated into real votes. To this end, the TikTok activity of presidential candidates Claudia Sheinbaum, Xóchitl Gálvez and Jorge Álvarez Máynez was examined, comparing digital metrics with surveys and electoral results. Development: The analysis included the compilation of data on the frequency of publications, the reach of the videos, the level of interaction and the content of the messages issued by each candidate. In addition, surveys conducted since January 2024 were evaluated, as well as the final results of the elections. It was observed that TikTok allowed candidates to build a public image and generate interaction with the electorate, but its impact on voting intention was relative. Claudia Sheinbaum maintained a stable trend, Xóchitl Gálvez showed variations in her performance depending on the pollsters and Jorge Álvarez Máynez experienced significant growth on social media, although this was not reflected in his electoral result. Conclusion: The study concluded that visibility on TikTok did not guarantee electoral success. Although social networks are powerful dissemination tools, territorial mobilization and traditional strategies are still decisive. The need to integrate digital platforms into a broader political strategy was emphasized.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:multid:v:2:y:2024:i::p:119:id:1062486agmu2024119
DOI: 10.62486/agmu2024119
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:multid:v:2:y:2024:i::p:119:id:1062486agmu2024119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://multidisciplinar.ageditor.uy/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.