Author
Abstract
Introduction: artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping education by enabling personalized learning, improving instructional practices, and automating academic and administrative tasks. Despite its accelerating adoption, evidence on AI’s effectiveness, challenges, and broader implications remains fragmented across technologies, contexts, and outcomes. Method: this study conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications from January 2020 to August 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches across Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ERIC, and the first 100 Google Scholar results were screened, appraised, and synthesized thematically. Thirty-nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Results: the synthesis revealed emerging trends in AI applications spanning special education, K–12 schooling, higher education, vocational training, and language learning. Reported benefits included personalized learning pathways, improved pedagogy and assessment, enhanced feedback mechanisms, reduced administrative workload, and increasing emphasis on AI literacy for both educators and students. Persistent challenges involved infrastructural limitations, inadequate teacher training, algorithmic bias, ethical and data-privacy concerns, and inequities in access. Notable research gaps included a shortage of classroom-based empirical evidence, limited ethical frameworks, underrepresentation of marginalized populations, and insufficient strategies for AI literacy development. Conclusions: AI holds transformative potential to enrich teaching, learning, and educational equity. Realizing this promise requires targeted investments in infrastructure and teacher professional development, integration of AI literacy into curricula, and the establishment of robust ethical and governance frameworks. Expanding empirical research—particularly in underrepresented contexts—will be critical to ensuring AI’s responsible and inclusive integration into education.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:795:id:795
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025795
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:795:id:795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.