Author
Listed:
- Vanjoreeh A. Madale
- Adelfa C. Silor
- Angeline P. Dinoro
- John Jr G. Adil
- Monera A. Salic-Hairulla
Abstract
Introduction: gender equality in education was recognized as a critical pillar of social development, encompassing equal access, equitable learning outcomes, and expanded opportunities. Despite the global commitment through Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 and 5, systemic disparities persisted, particularly in low-income, rural, and conflict-affected regions. Cultural norms, curriculum biases, and structural inequalities continued to limit the participation of girls and underrepresented genders in education, especially in STEM fields. The COVID-19 pandemic further widened these gaps by intensifying barriers related to digital access, caregiving burdens, and school dropout. Objective: this study aimed to map the challenges, innovations, and unexplored dimensions of gender equality in education by synthesizing peer-reviewed research published between 2020 and 2025. It sought to identify persistent barriers, examine effective interventions, and highlight emerging areas requiring further scholarly and policy attention. Methods: a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA framework. Articles published between 2020 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria focused on studies addressing gender equality in formal education. Thematic analysis was applied to synthesize findings, which were grouped into persistent challenges, innovations and interventions, and emerging research areas. Results: the review identified three themes: (1) persistent barriers such as entrenched gender norms, economic constraints, and STEM underrepresentation; (2) interventions including gender-sensitive teacher training, curriculum reform, and early childhood equity initiatives; and (3) emerging areas such as digital inclusion, climate-related educational risks, and intersectional inequities. Conclusions: achieving gender equality in education required sustained, intersectional, and context-responsive approaches. Bridging policy, pedagogy, and practice was essential for building inclusive and transformative education systems.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:781:id:781
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025781
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:781:id:781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.