IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip736id736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of English Literature Material (ELM) Module for Indonesian Students throught Meaningful Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Paisal Manurung
  • Yenni Rozimela
  • Atmazaki Atmazaki

Abstract

English literature played a vital role for non-native English speakers. It provided them with new experiences and insights, enhancing both their spoken and written global communication skills. These skills offered authentic experiences that helped the students to develop into English language teacher skills through meaningful learning in a controlled environment. But many universities in Indonesia still used classical ways. A new approach to learning English literature was urgent needed in the globalization era. So, this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the English literature material module for Indonesian students through meaningful learning to English teacher candidates. This was a quantitative paired research design. Fifteen students were involved in this study, involved in comparing two measurements, a pretest and a posttest taken from the same individual under different conditions. The results indicated that the module improved students’ English literary works in communicative ways through meaningful learning in the aspects of prior knowledge, critical analysis, and integration with related materials. In conclusion, the module quite effective to improve the students’ English literary works for students in higher education in Indonesia through meaningful learning. The study emphasized the importance of understanding students' knowledge before giving new materials, creating trigger questions, and the ability to associate materials with other new concepts. Therefore, it was recommended that the module integrated by meaningful learning could be applied for foreign language students to improve their communicative skills through English literary works, so it could be beneficial in self-efficacy, self-critical analysis, and self-integration.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:736:id:736
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025736
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:736:id:736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.