IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip683id683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rubric for evaluating teaching tasks: its contribution to the educational quality

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo de Jesús Pomares Bory
  • Odalys Vázquez Naranjo
  • Lourdes Guadalupe Arencibia Flores
  • Liliam Barrios Herrero
  • Manuela Gilda Bernardo Fuentes

Abstract

Introduction: the quality education required for Sustainable Development implies supporting the development of cognitive skills. The objective of this work is to analyze the educational quality contribution of a rubric designed in the Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences, at the Salvador Allende School of Medical Sciences, to evaluate explanatory teaching tasks in the discipline of Biological Basis of Medicine. Methods: an instrumental, descriptive, mixed-methods approach was developed. A case study based on grounded theory was applied. Theoretical methods were used: analysis-synthesis, induction-deduction, historical-logical, and systems approach; empirical methods: document review and consultation, expert judgment, and focus group; and mathematical-statistical methods. Results: the designed rubric is made up for four descriptors: describe and explain, corresponding to logical intellectual skills, as well as the correct use of the spanish language and self-assessment, concerning to self-training skills; which were accepted as to the relevance of their content. It was clarified that the designed rubric constitutes a methodologic tool that promotes and evaluates the metacognitive performance of students. Conclusions: the rubric designed in the Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences, at the Salvador Allende School of Medical Sciences, to evaluate teaching tasks of the discipline Biological Basis of Medicine, contributes to the educational quality of the teaching-learning process by encouraging and appreciating metacognition, a cognitive skill required for self-regulation of learning. Its use is proposed in departmental research as an appreciative instrument of the development of self-regulation of learning.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:683:id:683
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025683
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:683:id:683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.