IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip526id526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Efficacy and Perception in the Use of GAI Tools in the Translation Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Jahiro Samar Andrade Preciado
  • Rubén González Vallejo

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools in translation has sparked interest in their impact on translator training. This study examines the relationship between perception and self-efficacy in the use of GAI, specifically ChatGPT, within a specialized academic setting. The qualitative and exploratory research involved 30 final-year students from the Bachelor's Degree in Translation at the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC). Over the course of a semester, participants applied ChatGPT in pre-translation, translation, and post-editing tasks for specialized texts. To assess perception and self-efficacy in using these tools, a 15-item questionnaire with both closed and open-ended questions was used. The results indicate that a positive perception of ChatGPT is associated with greater confidence and performance in translation. However, challenges were identified, such as a lack of terminological accuracy and the need for specific training in post-editing. The findings suggest that the pedagogical integration of generative AI tools can strengthen translation competencies, reduce technological anxiety, and optimize the translation process. It is recommended to balance the use of these tools with teaching strategies that foster critical and creative skills. In conclusion, GAI presents both opportunities and challenges in translator training, highlighting the importance of proper implementation to maximize its benefits in professional practice.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:526:id:526
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025526
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:526:id:526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.