IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip436id436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Virginia Henderson’s Theory of the 14 Needs in the Clinical Training of Nursing Students

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Fernández Nieto
  • Jeannette Mercedes Acosta Nuñez

Abstract

Introduction: Virginia Henderson's Theory of 14 Needs is a humanistic framework that guides clinical nursing practice by promoting patient independence through the satisfaction of fundamental needs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the application of Henderson's Theory in nursing students, using the ENCH-56 as a measurement tool. Methods: A quasi-experimental, quantitative, longitudinal study was conducted with sixth-semester nursing students at a public university in Ecuador. The ENCH-56 scale was applied before and after a five-session educational intervention. Results: A total of 226 clinical evaluations were performed after the intervention. The overall mean per item ranged from 3.26 to 3.43 (scale 1-4), reflecting high performance with minimal supervision. The needs with the greatest variability were “values and beliefs” and “health education,” while “mobility,” “dressing,” and “ethics” showed greater consistency. Cluster analysis identified three groups of needs according to performance and dispersion. Fifty-seven point fifty-two percent of students perceived an improvement in their competencies after the intervention. Conclusions: The implementation of the Henderson model using the ENCH-56 was effective in strengthening comprehensive clinical assessment. Its systematic inclusion in clinical training is recommended.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:436:id:436
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025436
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:436:id:436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.