IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip434id434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital art as a tool for developing students creativity

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Galchynska
  • Olga Mykhailiuk
  • Sofiia Byedakova
  • Olena Vashchenko
  • Pavlo Hamolin

Abstract

Introduction: The study aimed to assess the status of digital art in the matrix of professional competencies among higher education students and explore its potential as a tool for developing creative thinking and skills. Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted using a survey involving 14 students enrolled in artistic higher education programs. The instrument comprised a six-question questionnaire, combining Likert-scale, binary-choice, and open-ended questions. The responses were analysed through systematic comparison and interpretation of students’ experiences with digital art in the educational process. Results: The results demonstrated a high level (100%) of student engagement with digital art tools in their curricula. Most respondents (85%) expressed positive expectations about the introduction of digital resources into the learning environment, while 57% acknowledged the practical development of creative skills through digital technologies. Despite this, students identified both benefits and perceived risks in the digitalisation of the artistic process, with equally divided opinions on its potential impact on creativity. The findings reflected a growing awareness of digital art as an inevitable component of modern artistic education. Conclusions: Digital art was confirmed as a relevant and effective educational tool that supports the development of both digital and creative skills. The study highlighted the need for updated methodological approaches that integrate digital art into educational strategies while preserving the integrity of human creativity.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:434:id:434
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025434
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:434:id:434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.