IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v4y2025ip424id424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition from the traditional method to artificial intelligence: a new vision for academic project management

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Ángel Medina Romero
  • Víctor Alfonso Erazo Arteaga
  • Daniel Washington Barzola Jaya
  • Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Mireles
  • Jorge Pablo Rivas-Díaz
  • Alberto Daniel Salinas Montemayor
  • David Israel Guerrero Vaca

Abstract

The study examines the transition from traditional methods to the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic project management, with the aim of assessing its effects on efficiency, adaptability, and quality in higher education. Framed within a positivist paradigm and using a mixed-methods approach, quantitative surveys (n=70) and qualitative semi-structured interviews (n=21) were conducted with lecturers and university managers. Quantitative data were processed with IBM SPSS Statistics 27, while qualitative information was analysed using NVivo 14, enabling triangulation of results and strengthening the study’s validity. Findings reveal that AI integration generates significant improvements in management efficiency (p=0.002), enhances institutional adaptability, and raises the quality of project execution. Four key thematic categories were identified: impact on efficiency, improvement of adaptability, perception of quality, and implementation challenges. Additional results highlight AI’s potential for strategic institutional planning, as well as a motivational effect on academic staff performance. It is concluded that AI constitutes a positive tool for innovation and optimisation in academic management, provided it is accompanied by organisational readiness, ethical oversight, and continuous training programmes to ensure its sustainable and responsible adoption in higher education.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:424:id:424
DOI: 10.56294/mw2025424
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:4:y:2025:i::p:424:id:424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.