IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip649id649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational Innovation in Ecuador: Impact of Design Thinking on Civic Education

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Elizabeth Asanza Romero
  • Joffre Vicente Quinteros Kohlhauser
  • Yilena Montero Reyes
  • Iliana Verónica Bastidas Cazares
  • Joanna Maricela Gallardo Solís

Abstract

The Ecuadorian education system faced the challenge of modernising its methodologies to strengthen student participation and critical understanding of issues such as democracy, human rights and citizen participation. In this context, the Design Thinking methodology was implemented as an innovative strategy to improve learning in the subject of Education for Citizenship. The study by Asanza Romero et al. (2024) analysed its application in an Ecuadorian educational institution, using a mixed approach with surveys, interviews and classroom observations. Analytical templates were designed to measure student perception and a methodological guide for teachers was produced. The results showed that Design Thinking increased motivation and facilitated a deeper understanding of civic concepts. Eighty per cent of students reported greater engagement, and 75% highlighted that the methodology allowed them to relate the content to their social reality. However, the implementation of this methodology faced obstacles such as the lack of teacher training and the digital divide (Villalta, 2023). For it to be successful, it was recommended to strengthen training in digital skills (Prendes & Castañeda, 2019) and improve access to technological resources. Design Thinking proved to be an effective tool for transforming civic education in Ecuador, promoting active and inclusive learning.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:649:id:649
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024649
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:649:id:649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.