IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip612id612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tuskegee experiment, bioethical violation as present and future in the development of human society

Author

Listed:
  • Maria de la Caridad Casanova Moreno
  • Francisco Machado Reyes
  • Wagner González Casanova
  • Daimy Casanova Moreno
  • Diana Belkis Gómez Guerra

Abstract

Introduction. The Tuskegee Experiment was a clinical study between 1932 and 1972 in the American city of Tuskegee, by the United States Public Health Service. Objective. Describe the history of the Tuskegee experiment, as a violation of bioethics for the present and future in the development of human society. Material and method. A retrospective historical study was carried out where theoretical methods such as documentary and historical-logical analysis were used. Development. Six hundred African-American sharecroppers, mostly illiterate who did not give informed consent, were studied to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis and whether it could lead to death. This generated controversy and led to changes in the legal protection of patients in clinical studies, leading to the establishment of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research and the National Research Act. Conclusions. History has given us a painful lesson, but one that we cannot stop learning and the teaching that ethical sensitivity must be raised. Any scientific experiment, no matter how well technically designed, cannot forget the experimental subject, much less when it involves vulnerable populations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:612:id:612
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024612
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:612:id:612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.