IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip572id572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of feedback in autonomous university learning

Author

Listed:
  • Bismar Ariel Conde Arteaga
  • Johana Carolina Lastra Cordero
  • Jessica Viviana Peláez Álava
  • Leili Betty Segura Quiñonez
  • Narcisa Dolores Piza Burgos

Abstract

In Ecuadorian higher education, the quality of autonomous learning and the self-regulation capacity of students have faced persistent challenges. Despite advances in educational policies, students continued to experience difficulties in managing their learning, which impacted their academic performance and professional preparation. One of the determining factors was the lack of effective feedback from teachers, who focused on summative assessments rather than formative approaches. Feedback played a key role in teaching and learning, as it allowed students to reflect on their performance and adjust their study strategies. However, in many cases, this feedback was unidirectional, corrective and late, which limited its impact on improving learning. In addition, a lack of understanding of how to use feedback reduced its effectiveness in developing autonomous learning. Another problem identified was the variability in the quality and accessibility of feedback due to teachers' time and resource constraints. In distance education, asynchronous communication made the interaction necessary for effective feedback even more difficult. Furthermore, the lack of teacher training in innovative strategies prevented the use of the potential of feedback to promote self-regulation of learning. In conclusion, transforming feedback into a pedagogical tool was essential to improve self-regulation and autonomous learning, requiring teacher training and evidence-based strategies.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:572:id:572
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024572
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:572:id:572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.