IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip533id533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Mammography and Alternative Screening Methods in Breast Cancer Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Anbazhagan. S
  • Vivek Saraswat
  • Satya Sundar Gajendra Mohapatra
  • Joginder Joginder
  • Jamuna. K.V
  • Kanchana. A
  • Swarna Swetha Kolaventi

Abstract

Breast cancer is still one of the main reasons women get sick and die, which has brought a lot of attention to screening programs that try to find the disease early and increase survival rates. For a long time, mammography has been the usual way to check for breast cancer. However, it has some problems, like giving fake positives and negatives and not working as well in women with thick breast tissue. These problems have led to the search for other screening methods. This study looks at how well mammography and newer alternative screening methods find breast cancer. It looks at their pros and cons and how they might be able to improve current screening methods. Mammography is widely used, but it has been criticized for not being sensitive enough, especially in younger women and women with thicker breast tissue, where it may miss cancers or give false results that lead to tests that aren't needed. Even with these problems, mammography has been shown to lower the death rate from breast cancer in older women through regular screening, and it is still the gold standard in many national breast cancer programs. New options like ultrasound, MRI, DBT, and CEM show promise in making sensitivity and precision better. Ultrasound, especially when used with mammograms, can help find breast cancer in women with thick breasts, but the accuracy depends on how skilled the expert is. MRI is better at finding breast cancer, especially in people who are at a high risk, but it is more expensive and doesn't find as many cancers. This means that more false positives and needless treatments happen. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) gives three-dimensional images, which compared to regular mammography increases the number of cancers found while decreasing the number of false positives and the need for follow-up images. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), which combines the benefits of mammography with contrast agents, may help doctors make more accurate diagnoses, especially for women whose breast tissue is thick.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:533:id:533
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024533
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:533:id:533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.