IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip522id522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Multi-Drug Resistance in MBL-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria from Clinical Samples: A Phenotypic Approach in Hospitalized Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Naresh Kaushik
  • Soumya Surath Panda
  • Nyalam Ramu
  • Prateek Garg
  • Nittin Sharma
  • Uma Bhardwaj

Abstract

Background: Global public health faces a substantial risk due to antimicrobial resistance, especially in clinical settings where tackling the formidable issue of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is crucial. Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing GNB continue to pose a serious threat to medical infection management in hospitals as well as communities. Methods: Therapeutic options must be guided by the timely identification of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains using critical techniques including antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and a MBL monitoring. This study investigates the frequency and transportation as well as antimicrobial sensitivity of GNB that produce MBL and MDR germs in medical specimens were obtained. Aseptically taken from study-eligible in- and out-patients, 491 materials (blood, urine, and wound) produced GNB, which were recovered using conventional bacteriological methods. Results: To identify the single GNB, determine the AST and discover the GNB that produced MBL. Gram-negative microbes were found to be growing in 130 cases (26.47%), with the most common isolates being Escherichia coli (15.38%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.92%), and Burkholderiacepacia (30.76%). GNB were common in urine samples in other test categories with a frequency of (31.53%). Conclusion: To support wise treatment choices, comprehensive antibiotic and MBL screening for drug-resistant GNB is essential. It is highly advised to examine antibiotic usage rules, promote the sensible use of prescription antibiotics, and improve detection of GNB that produces MBL.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:522:id:522
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024522
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:522:id:522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.