IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip479id479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of dietary characteristics on food consumption in humans

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina De La Torre Ibarra

Abstract

The Specific Sensory Satiety Theory (SSST) has attempted to explain the mechanism of modification of self-regulatory behaviour (Hetherington & Rolls, 1996), proposing that subjects tend to consume a greater quantity of food when it has diverse sensory properties (varied diet). In contrast, subjects consume a smaller amount of food if it has similar sensory properties (monotonous diet). With regard to the effects of presenting diets with monotonous and varied sensory characteristics on humans, there are numerous studies that affirm that the availability of diverse foods is one of the factors that contribute to their overconsumption and, therefore, self-regulatory behaviours are not observed (McCrory, Fuss, McCallum, Yao, Vinken, Hays & Roberts, 1999; Rolls, 1985; Rolls, 2007). The main objective of this work was to experimentally evaluate the effect of foods with monotonous and varied sensory characteristics on food consumption in humans. To this end, three experiments were carried out: 1) Experiment 1: aimed to assess the consumption behaviour of monotonous and varied diets, presented in different sequences with intervals of approximately 23 hours between each presentation. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part. The main results of Experiment 1 showed that the groups exposed to a single type of food presented a stable consumption. On the other hand, in the groups exposed to monotonous and varied foods, it was observed that the variety influenced the increase in consumption by the participants; Experiment 2: aimed to evaluate the effect of exposing the participants to monotonous or varied diets presented in different sequences with intervals of approximately 23 hours between each presentation. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part; the main results showed that the groups exposed to the varied diet selected and consumed a greater quantity of food in comparison with the groups exposed to the monotonous diet, regardless of whether the food was provided simultaneously or successively. On the other hand, it was observed that the group exposed to monotonous foods simultaneously selected and consumed more foods than the group exposed to foods successively, while the group exposed to varied foods successively selected and consumed a greater quantity of foods in comparison to the group exposed to varied foods simultaneously. and, 3) Experiment 3: Experiment 2 was replicated with the following objectives: a) To evaluate the effects of exposing participants to monotonous or varied diets, simultaneously or successively, on consumption behaviour; and b) To identify the differences and/or similarities between the effects on the resulting behavioural parameters and the effects on the behavioural parameters observed in Experiment 2. Sixteen naïve experimental university students of both sexes, aged between 18 and 27, took part; the main results showed that the groups exposed to varied foods selected and consumed a greater quantity of food compared to the groups exposed to monotonous foods, regardless of whether the foods were provided simultaneously or successively. On the other hand, it was observed that the group exposed to monotonous foods simultaneously selected and consumed more portions than the group exposed to foods successively, while the group exposed to varied foods successively selected and consumed a greater number of portions compared to the group exposed to varied foods simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:479:id:479
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024479
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:479:id:479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.