IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip389id389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnosis of the erudition presented by neurosurgeons in acupuncture and its related techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Yamilia Menéndez Zapata
  • Mayelin LIosa Santana
  • Dayami Gutierrez Vera
  • Tania Rosa González García
  • Inerkys Veranes Garzón

Abstract

Introduction: Natural and Traditional Medicine is defined by the World Health Organization as the sum total of knowledge, skills and practices based on the theories, beliefs and experiences of different cultures, whether explainable or not, used to maintain health, prevent, diagnose, improve or treat physical and mental diseases. It only has 68 hours of classes in plan E. It is effective in the symptomatic treatment of patients with mild neurotrauma, a hospital indicator that all professionals must meet. Objective: To diagnose the level of erudition presented by neurosurgeons in acupuncture and its related techniques for the care of patients with mild neurotrauma. Method: A mixed, observational, longitudinal, longitudinal, prospective study was carried out at the Miguel Enríquez HDCQ in the period from February 2022 to May 2024 in the neurosurgery service. Theoretical, empirical and mathematical statistical methods were used in a population of 20 neurosurgery professionals to whom three validated instruments were applied. Results: Through the methodological triangulation of the instruments that were applied and the parameterization of the variable professional performance of the neurosurgeon in the application of acupuncture and related techniques in four dimensions and 18 indicators, an inadequate performance in 80% was obtained. Conclusions: It is concluded that the initial diagnosis of the level of erudition presented by neurosurgeons in acupuncture and related techniques for the care of patients with mild neurotrauma is inadequate.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:389:id:389
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024389
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:389:id:389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.