IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v2y2023ip41id41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution from the diagnosis of death to encephalic death

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Hodelín Tablada

Abstract

Introduction: Death is a process whose diagnosis has varied throughout history. Objective: Demonstrate the various methods of diagnosing death until brain death is confirmed. Methods: A historical documentary review was conducted on the various methods used to diagnose death. Results: In ancient times, the cessation of breathing was the primary indicator of death. However, with the emergence of clinical death, cardiac activity became the main criterion for diagnosing death. In the late 1950s, European neurologists identified a stage at which the brain ceases to function, exhibiting irreversible damage. However, artificial means can sustain the functions of the heart and lungs. In 1959, professors Mollaret and Goulon from the Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris introduced the term “coma dépassé”' to describe a state beyond coma, where a “dead brain is associated with a living body.” This concept led to the development of brain death and the diagnosis of death through the lens of brain functions. This change facilitated the advancement of organ and tissue transplants. Conclusions: Currently, death can be diagnosed by either the cessation of heart function or the irreversible cessation of brain function

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:41:id:41
DOI: 10.56294/mw202341
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:41:id:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.