IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v2y2023ip144id144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Whole Organ Decellularization Protocols for Kidney Transplantation and Vascular Integrity Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Yogendra Bhati
  • Biswaranjan Mohanty
  • Manashree Mane

Abstract

The shortage of donor kidneys highlights the need for innovative approaches to transplantation. Whole-organ decellularization creates acellular scaffolds suitable for recellularization with recipient-derived cells, reducing the risk of immune rejection. A key challenge is preserving vascular integrity during decellularization to ensure organ functionality. This aims to compare three decellularization protocols, detergent-based, enzyme-based, and a combined approach, for their effectiveness in maintaining vascular integrity (VI), ECM retention, and perfusion capacity. Additionally, factors influencing VI are analyzed using statistical techniques. Kidneys were processed using the three protocols. VI was measured using parameters such as ECM retention percentage, vascular leakage rates, and perfusion capacity. Pearson correlation analysis determined correlations between parameters such as decellularization time and vascular outcomes. One-way ANOVA contrasted protocol performance, and logistic regression determined predictors of preservation of VI. There were significant differences in ECM retention between protocols. The detergent-based process showed superior ECM retention and reduced vascular leakage compared to other processes. Logistic regression found decellularization time and solution concentration were important predictors of vascular preservation. The detergent-based protocol better maintained VI and ECM retention, thus holding potential for future clinical use in kidney transplantation. Additional optimization might further improve scaffold quality and functional results.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:144:id:144
DOI: 10.56294/mw2023144
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:144:id:144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.