IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v2y2023ip121id121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Considerations in Critical Care Nursing and Their Impact on Professional Conduct in Intensive Care Units

Author

Listed:
  • Sachet Dawar
  • Ritarani Nayak
  • Renuka Jyothi S

Abstract

Making moral decisions is a crucial part of nursing practice since intensive care units (ICUs) commonly provides moral conundrums pertaining to patient autonomy, informed consent, and resource allocation. Critical care nursing requires intricate decision-making in high-pressure environments in shaping patient care and professional conduct. Despite their importance in ICUs, ethical considerations often cause moral distress and uncertainty for nurses. The absence of standardized training and institutional support leads to inconsistencies in professional conduct, affecting patient care quality and teamwork. Research involved ICU nurses from multiple hospitals, with a sample size of 150 participants selected through stratified random sampling. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were performed, such as logistic regression models to examine the impact of ethical training on critical care decision-making and chi-square tests to investigate associations between professional behaviour and ethical awareness. The findings revealed a significant correlation between ethical awareness and professional conduct, with nurses who received formal ethical training demonstrating higher adherence to ethical principles. Ethical challenges related to appropriate care and resource allocation were the most frequently reported dilemmas. Additionally, nurses with institutional support and ethical guidelines exhibited lower levels of moral distress and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. Resolving these moral dilemmas improves decision-making, lessens moral suffering, and creates a more moral and professional intensive care unit, all of which contribute to better patient care.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:121:id:121
DOI: 10.56294/mw2023121
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:121:id:121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.