IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v2y2023ip119id119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Challenges in Pharmaceutical Marketing: A Multidimensional Analysis of Healthcare Industry Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Malathi H
  • Rohini
  • Laxmidhar Maharana

Abstract

Pharmaceutical marketing plays a crucial role in shaping healthcare practices, influencing both medical professionals and consumers. However, ethical concerns have emerged regarding deceptive advertising, financial incentives for healthcare providers, and the exploitation of vulnerable populations. The objective is to assess how various marketing strategies influence public and healthcare professionals' ethical perceptions of pharmaceutical industry practices and identify areas for improvement in regulatory frameworks. Independent variables include Direct-to-Consumer Advertising (DTCA), Financial Incentives (FI) to healthcare providers, Transparency of Drug Information (TDI), Regulatory Compliance (RC), and Public Trust (PT) in the pharmaceutical industry. The dependent variable is the Ethical Perception of Pharmaceutical Marketing(EPPM),measured by the perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients on the ethical practices in pharmaceutical marketing and their trust in the industry. Data is collected through surveys of 306 healthcare professionals and 216 patients, along with interviews with pharmaceutical executives, using descriptive statistics and regression analysis in SPSS 25. Regression analysis reveals significant correlations between pharmaceutical marketing practices and public trust. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify relationships between revealed varying levels of ethical concerns, particularly related to DTCA and financial incentives. The findings suggest that increased transparency, adherence to regulations, and ethical advertising could improve industry practices and enhance public confidence in pharmaceutical companies.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:119:id:119
DOI: 10.56294/mw2023119
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:119:id:119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.