IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v2y2023ip101id101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of Simulation-Based Training on Nursing Student Clinical Decision-Making Skills

Author

Listed:
  • Malathi H
  • Ashutosh Niranjan
  • Sasmita Das

Abstract

Nursing students must be able to make clinical decisions that have a direct impact on patient outcomes and quality of care. Traditional clinical training may not provide sufficient hands-on experience in complex or high-risk situations. Simulation-based training (SBT) provides a controlled environment where students can practice clinical decision-making (CDM), but its direct impact on decision-making competence requires further research. To evaluate the ability of SBT to improve nurse trainees' competence in CDM. To compare progress in reaction time, critical thinking, problem-solving, confidence, and decision-making before and after simulation training. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test approach was used, with nursing students in the clinical training phase. Participants underwent high-fidelity simulation (HFS) scenarios to evaluate their decision-making ability. Data were gathered by structured observational checklists, self-reported confidence questionnaires, and performance evaluations. ANOVAs and paired t-tests were used to compare the results before and after the intervention. Results showed that SBT significantly improved nursing students' ability to evaluate critical thinking, their level of confidence, and their ability to respond time effectively under pressure. The findings demonstrated that following the intervention, decision-making abilities significantly improved; SBT is an effective educational technique to help nursing students improve their CDM skills.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:101:id:101
DOI: 10.56294/mw2023101
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:2:y:2023:i::p:101:id:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.