Author
Listed:
- Gudur
- S
- Mishra
- Arora
- Farhan
- Priya Vijayan
- Singh
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an important part of treating cancer because it stops tumors from growing while hurting good cells around them as little as possible. The treatment goal is to give enough radiation to effectively target and kill cancer cells while saving normal tissue from harmful side effects. Optimizing the dose of radiation is a key part of achieving this careful balance. This paper talks about the ideas, problems, and progress made in figuring out the best radiation doses to kill tumors and protect good tissue at the same time. In the past, radiation treatment doses were set by regular guidelines that took into account things like the type, size, and position of the growth. But these methods don't always take into account how different patients' bodies are, how the tumor's environment changes, or how healthy cells change when they are exposed to radiation. To fix this, individual treatment planning, made possible by improvements in imaging methods such as functional MRI and PET scans, is becoming more and more important for finding the best dose. These tools give us a more complete picture of the tumor's location and biology in real time, which can help us apply radiation more precisely. New methods, like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), proton treatment, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), have made dose distribution more accurate. This means that bigger amounts can be sent to tumors while exposing healthy tissue nearby less. Biological models and dose-painting techniques are also becoming more popular. In these methods, the radiation dose is changed in different parts of the tumor based on how different they are, which makes the treatment even more effective. Even with these improvements, one of the biggest problems still is finding the best balance between the competing goals of controlling tumors and keeping healthy organs safe.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:824:id:824
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025824
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:824:id:824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.