IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip761id761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioactive Compound Composition in Tea Varieties and Gambir for Biomedical Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalina
  • Amran
  • Yuliana
  • Surya Mentari
  • Oktarina
  • Fadillah

Abstract

A comparative study of Tea Varieties (Green Tea, black tea) and Gambir sourced from Indonesia is crucial for understanding their potential as natural therapeutic agents. This research aimed to analyze and compare the moisture, ash, catechin, and tannin content of these three plant-based products. The study employed a quantitative descriptive method, with data analysis conducted using the One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess significant differences between the samples. The primary sources of information were laboratory measurements. The results show significant variations in all tested parameters. Gambir had the highest catechin and tannin content, at 11.51 mg/g and 6.50 mg/g, respectively, surpassing both green tea and black tea. Green tea exhibited the highest moisture and ash content, while gambir had the lowest. The findings highlight the unique chemical profile of each plant, with gambir's high catechin concentration making it a valuable, yet underutilized, source for therapeutic applications. The distinct chemical and physical profiles of these plants underscore the importance of standardized quality control measures to ensure their consistency and efficacy. This research provides a crucial foundation for the development of standardized herbal products and supports future investigation into the biomedical potential of these indigenous Indonesian resources. This study, through a comprehensive comparative analysis of green tea, black tea, and gambir, confirms their distinct chemical compositions. These findings serve as a valuable resource for future research aimed at isolating specific Bioactive Compounds and exploring their mechanisms of action in various disease models.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:761:id:761
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025761
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:761:id:761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.