IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip717id717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale: Implications for Mental Health and Quality of Life of College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Reddy
  • Sureshkumar

Abstract

Introduction: Interpersonal relationships are defined as mutual interactions as well as behaviours an individual experiences at varying levels. Interpersonal cognitive distortions have been found to affect the overall mental well-being of an individual and are also known to increase the risk of depression and suicide. The current study aims to establish psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among college students. Methods: The current study is a descriptive study with a non-probability convenience sampling with a sample size of 297 participants. Results: Face and content validity was adequately established for the scale. The scale has good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.910 and a Guttman split half coefficient of 0.83. The model showed a good fit with absolute indices such as x2, x2/df, TLI, NFI, CFI, RMR, RMSEA showing good fit value. The average variance extracted and composite reliability for all three factors were greater than 0.5 and 0.7 respectively thereby showing good convergent validity and composite reliability. The AVE values were greater than the squared intercorrelation, thereby showing good discriminant validity. Conclusion: The scale had demonstrated good psychometric properties, and it is suitable to use in a college setting demonstrating significant relevance in the overall well-being of students thereby aiding practitioners, clinicians, and academicians in ensuring student health and wellness.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:717:id:717
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025717
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:717:id:717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.