IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip700id700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' Autonomy and Its Determinants in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Tuasikal
  • Dhamanti
  • Mahmudah

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses' autonomy is a critical component of effective clinical practice, closely tied to professional competence, patient safety, job satisfaction, and organizational support. Despite its importance, autonomy remains variably defined and experienced across different healthcare systems and cultural contexts. This review explores the determinants, expressions, and implications of nurses’ autonomy based on an analysis of recent international studies. Methods: This research design uses a PRISMA-ScR in February 2024 based on PRISMA guidelines. Studies were taken from Esco, ScienceDirect, Google search, and PubMed and searched in English using the keywords nurse or nurses or registered nurse, clinical privilege or clinical autonomy or professional autonomy nurse, patient safety or quality of care from 2020 to 2024. Results: The findings reveal that nurses’ autonomy is positively associated with professional competence, role clarity, and supportive work environments. Autonomy enables nurses to participate in safety activities, advocate for patients, and contribute meaningfully to decision-making processes. Conversely, autonomy is often limited by hierarchical organizational structures, inadequate staffing, and a lack of managerial support. Studies also show that autonomy is context-dependent, with higher levels reported in critical care settings and among more experienced or specially trained nurses. Tools such as HSOPSC, SAQ, and NPC scales were commonly used to assess related variables. Conclusions: The review highlights that fostering nurses’ autonomy requires not only individual competence but also systemic change. Educational initiatives, leadership development, and non-punitive safety cultures are essential to empowering nurses.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:700:id:700
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025700
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:700:id:700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.