IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip630id630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Modalities and Management of Sialolithiasis: An experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Qurishi
  • Chandana
  • Mhaske
  • Vohra
  • Gupta
  • Sidhu

Abstract

Introduction: Sialolithiasis, the calcification of stones in the salivary glands, is an over diagnosed but under diagnosed condition that can cause significant pain, discomfort, and impaired gland function. Early diagnosis and effective management are important to prevent complications. The research takes into account the diagnostic modalities and management of Sialolithiasis. Aim: The objective of research is to compare the effectiveness of various diagnostic techniques in diagnosing Sialolithiasis and different management techniques, both conservative and surgical. Methods: The research was performed on a sample of 350 Sialolithiasis-diagnosed patients. Diagnostic processes involving sialography, ultrasonography, and CT scans were performed on the participants. Therapeutic approaches, such as sialogogues, massage, and surgical extraction, were applied and results were compared according to the size, position, and material of the stones. Success rates, complications, and healing periods were assessed. Results: The research revealed that ultrasonography and sialography were the best non-invasive diagnostic methods with CT scans helpful in identifying larger and deeper stones. Surgical treatment yielded the most conclusive results, especially in large or multiple stones. Conservative measures were successful in small, superficial stones, but recurrence was frequent in larger ones. Conclusion: Early diagnosis of Sialolithiasis is crucial for preventing further complications. While non-invasive techniques are effective for initial detection, surgical intervention remains the most reliable method for stone removal. Further research is needed to explore minimally invasive options and improve management strategies for different stone sizes and gland locations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:630:id:630
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025630
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:630:id:630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.