IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip591id591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epidemiological Insights into Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis among COVID-19 Inpatients: Unveiling Diverse Pathogens with implications on cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Patro
  • Mane
  • Rami
  • Ojha
  • Kaushik
  • Swathi

Abstract

The emergence of invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (IFRS), as well as COVID-19 at the same time, poses a challenge to patients receiving treatment in hospitals. Research have shown various infections caused by fungi that relate to the epidemiology of invasive fungal rhinosinusitis among patients suffering from COVID-19. In this retrospective analysis, examined mycological investigations, subject characteristics, clinical manifestations, antifungal drugs used and length of illness among 68 patients diagnosed with Acute Invasive Fungal Rhino-Sinusitis (AIFRS). The research results indicated that steroid therapy was applied in 32.81% of cases and more than half of examines were men. The necessity for early detection is highlighted by the variety of clinical symptoms of headaches (22.40%). Tissue culture, histological analysis and molecular identification of culture isolates were all part of the mycological research. Amphotericin B (30.21%) and Nystatin (22.40%) were the antifungal drugs utilized, indicating a customized approach to therapy. The length of the disease varied by 22.92% of patients reported symptoms lasting between 16 and 30 days. The age distribution showed that the 50 to 59 age group accounted for a significant amount (13.02%). The research highlights the vital need for caution while identifying and treating AIFRS in COVID-19 inpatients, with a focus on a variety of infections and specialized treatment modalities.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:591:id:591
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025591
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:591:id:591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.