IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v4y2025ip590id590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Virulence Genes and Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Poultry Carcasses

Author

Listed:
  • N
  • Patel
  • Garg
  • Kaur
  • Ramu
  • Ray

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a major human pathogen, poses a significant threat to food, particularly meat products, due to its aggressiveness and drug resistance. Research aims to identify and analyze P. aeruginosa samples from poultry carcasses, examining their antimicrobial resistance and potential pathogenicity patterns. A total of 670 samples of poultry carcasses were gathered from slaughterhouses and shopping centers. Biochemical testing, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) targeted the oprL gene, and culture-based techniques were used to identify the isolates. The virulence factors were identified both genotypically (by PCR amplification of exoS, toxA, and lasB) and phenotypically (by detection of hemolysin, protease, elastase, and biofilm formation). Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 26) to evaluate the results and determine associations between antibiotic resistance profiles and phenotypic virulence features. P. aeruginosa was identified from 102 samples (15.2%) out of 670 samples. Protease activity was identified in 69.6% of these isolates, hemolysin synthesis in 76.5%, and biofilm formation in 83.3%. According to PCR data, 58.8% of the isolates had exoS, 51.9% had toxA, and 64.7% had lasB. Ceftazidime (61.7%) and ciprofloxacin (52.9%) showed high resistance, with 48.0% of cases being categorized as multidrug-resistant (MDR). Public health is likely to be at risk due to the presence of virulent, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in poultry carcasses, which emphasizes better hygiene management and antimicrobial surveillance in poultry processing.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:590:id:590
DOI: 10.56294/hl2025590
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:4:y:2025:i::p:590:id:590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.