IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/health/v3y2025ip.250id.250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What happens after the funeral: Ergonomic evaluation of the gravedigger's workstation, looking for paths towards a preventive culture

Author

Listed:
  • Jiménez
  • Hernández-Runque
  • Ron
  • González Argote

Abstract

The objective of the research was to evaluate the dysergonomic conditions and factors of musculoskeletal conditions in gravediggers of a private cemetery. Materials and methods: The study was framed in the quantitative, field, non-experimental paradigm of a descriptive level with an ergonomic approach. The population and sample was census type and consisted of eighteen (18) workers, who work as gravediggers/gardeners. Observation and interview were used as data collection techniques and the pain body schema and the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method were used as information collection instruments. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using descriptive and correlational statistics. Results: This was a population composed exclusively of men with an average age of 49.4 years. The study revealed that the pain areas, the shoulders were the most affected, followed by the knees, lower back and elbows. The results of the REBA evaluation reflect a work environment with high biomechanical demands, where all the activities evaluated presented "high" or "very high" risk levels. Conclusions: The results obtained in this study reflect a worrying panorama in terms of occupational health for gravediggers, evidencing high levels of biomechanical risk in all the activities evaluated. The activities carried out, characterized by significant daily variability, involve extreme postures and repetitive movements that mainly affect the trunk, shoulders and. the neck, areas that present the highest risk scores according to the REBA method

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2025:i::p:.250:id:.250
DOI: 10.56294/hl2024.250
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:health:v:3:y:2025:i::p:.250:id:.250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hl.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.